Skip to content
Aesthetics InternationalTreatments reviewed. Protocols vetted.
Reviews What works, what doesn't By concern Head to head Protocols Global faculty Journal Dr Sin Yong Ask us
WhatsApp +65 8023 7170[email protected]drsinyong.com
Promising

PRF and 'EZ Gel'

Platelet-rich fibrin · heated plasma gel 'natural filler'

'EZ Gel' and 'bio-filler' have spread through US injector Instagram and beauty newsletters as the 'natural filler' for people who have dissolved their hyaluronic acid and want something autologous for the under-eye.

The verdict Promising

It is a biostimulant with a few months of soft volume; treated as that, it has a place after dissolving, before the next decision.

Reviewed against the Aesthetics International standard. Category: Regenerative.

Does PRF and 'EZ Gel' work?

Promising. It is a biostimulant with a few months of soft volume; treated as that, it has a place after dissolving, before the next decision. Systematic reviews of PRP and PRF for facial rejuvenation find small studies with improvement in skin thickness and elasticity more often than in wrinkles or pigmentation, and no serious adverse events.

Verdict
Promising Plausible mechanism and early evidence. Reasonable to try with realistic expectations.
Evidence base
4 PubMed-indexed studies cited below, including systematic reviews.
Suits
Thin, crepey under-eye skin or fine lines in people who want an autologous option and accept a short-lived, modest result with repeat sessions.
Not for
True hollows or bags, anyone expecting the longevity of hyaluronic acid, and anyone sold it as a 'natural facelift'.
In Singapore
Autologous blood products are prepared and injected by doctors in licensed clinics in Singapore.
Category
Regenerative
Reviewed
1 October 2026 by Aesthetics International. Revised as evidence and regulation change.

What it is

Platelet-rich fibrin is blood spun without anticoagulant so it forms a soft fibrin clot or liquid that releases growth factors slowly. 'EZ Gel' and similar heat the platelet-poor plasma to denature albumin into a gel, then mix it with liquid PRF to make a thicker, longer-lasting injectable. It is sold as a filler; it behaves as a short-lived volumiser and a biostimulant.

How it works

Fibrin traps platelets and leukocytes and releases growth factors over days rather than minutes, which is the proposed advantage over PRP. Heating plasma turns albumin into a gel that holds shape for weeks to a few months before being resorbed. Any volume effect is temporary; any lasting benefit is collagen stimulation, which is modest. Preparation varies with every centrifuge, tube and heating protocol.

What the evidence says

Systematic reviews of PRP and PRF for facial rejuvenation find small studies with improvement in skin thickness and elasticity more often than in wrinkles or pigmentation, and no serious adverse events. A 2025 systematic review of periorbital treatment found PRF improved texture and crepiness while its effect often faded by six months. The heated albumin gel has biocompatibility and degradation data in animals and dental use, and clinical series for the face, but no controlled trials against hyaluronic acid filler or against PRF alone. Marketing has run well ahead of the data.

What people are saying

Paraphrased from public discussion on TikTok, Instagram, Reddit and in the press. Not testimonials, and not about any one clinic. Reported in: joleneedgar.substack.com, aol.com.

What the studies show

  1. systematic review

    Twenty studies in 514 patients reported significant improvement most often for skin thickness and elasticity, less often for wrinkles and texture, and not for hydration, with no serious adverse events.

    Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Rejuvenation — Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2025. PMID 40167104.

  2. systematic review

    Across fourteen studies PRF improved periorbital texture and crepiness while PRP had stronger evidence for pigmentation; PRF improvements often diminished by six months.

    A Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Periorbital Rejuvenation — Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2025. PMID 41190633.

  3. review

    A decade review of injectable PRF describing preparation, the slow release of growth factors from the fibrin matrix, and its extension into facial aesthetics with limited comparative data.

    Ten years of injectable platelet-rich fibrin — Periodontology 2000, 2024. PMID 38037213.

  4. cohort

    Heat-denatured albumin combined with liquid PRF was biocompatible and degraded over months in an animal model, the basis for the heated plasma gel products.

    In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility and biodegradation of a new denatured plasma membrane combined with liquid PRF (Alb-PRF) — Platelets, 2021. PMID 32531175.

Studies are selected for relevance and quality, not for agreement with the verdict; PubMed records are linked so the reader can check them.

Who it suits

Suits

Thin, crepey under-eye skin or fine lines in people who want an autologous option and accept a short-lived, modest result with repeat sessions.

Not for

True hollows or bags, anyone expecting the longevity of hyaluronic acid, and anyone sold it as a 'natural facelift'.

Alternatives

The two reviewed treatments most often weighed against PRF and 'EZ Gel', on the same standard.

PRF and 'EZ Gel'Pico laserPDRN and polynucleotides
VerdictPromisingVettedEstablished
What it isPlatelet-rich fibrin is blood spun without anticoagulant so it forms a soft fibrin clot or liquid that releases growth factors slowly.A picosecond laser delivers energy in pulses a thousand times shorter than the nanosecond lasers that came before it.Polynucleotides are DNA fragments, usually purified from salmon or trout gonads, injected into the dermis in micro-droplets.
Evidence base4 PubMed-indexed studies cited below, including systematic reviews.4 PubMed-indexed studies cited below, including systematic reviews.3 PubMed-indexed studies cited below, including systematic reviews, randomised trials.
SuitsThin, crepey under-eye skin or fine lines in people who want an autologous option and accept a short-lived, modest result with repeat sessions.Sun spots, freckles, post-acne marks, tattoo ink, uneven tone in Asian skin when energy is set conservatively.Thin, crepey under-eye skin; dull, inflamed or acne-prone skin; post-procedure recovery; people who want quality rather than volume.
In one lineIt is a biostimulant with a few months of soft volume; treated as that, it has a place after dissolving, before the next decision.The variable that matters is depth, not brightness, and pigment already deposited is only half the problem; the inflammation producing it is the other half.The injected courses are a sensible part of a skin plan; the salmon-sperm facial is mostly the microneedling doing the work.

Risks

Bruising, lumps and swelling for days, infection if blood handling is poor, and disappointment when the gel resorbs. Vascular risk is lower than with cross-linked filler but not zero.

In Singapore

Autologous blood products are prepared and injected by doctors in licensed clinics in Singapore. Confirm the centrifuge and tube system's HSA registration with the provider; heated plasma gel preparations are an off-label modification.

“It is a biostimulant with a few months of soft volume; treated as that, it has a place after dissolving, before the next decision.”
Aesthetics International review · Regenerative

Questions

Is EZ Gel a filler?
It adds soft volume for weeks to a few months while the gel resorbs. It does not last like hyaluronic acid and cannot shape a feature.
PRF or PRP?
PRF releases growth factors more slowly and seems to suit texture and crepiness; PRP has slightly better evidence for pigmentation. Neither is strongly evidenced.
How long does it last?
Reviews find periorbital improvement often fading by six months; the volume effect is shorter.

Cite this review

Aesthetics International (2026). PRF and 'EZ Gel': does it work? Evidence, risks and verdict. https://aesthetics-international.org/treatments/prf-ez-gel/ (reviewed 1 October 2026).

Editorial, unpaid and independent of any manufacturer. Verdict: Promising. See what works and what doesn't across all 153 reviews. Spotted an error or a newer study? Suggest a correction — changes are logged on the corrections page. Terms are defined in the glossary.

Have a question about this treatment?

Ask us — or ask to be matched with a practitioner in Singapore who follows evidence-based treatment. Whether it is right for you is decided at an in-person assessment, not by a review; sometimes the answer is a different treatment, or none.

WhatsApp +65 8023 7170

Suggest a treatment to review

Physicians, manufacturers and readers can propose a treatment for review. Reviews are editorial and are not paid for.

[email protected]